I'm sorry, but that was out of left field, Rick is running .30? Where did this release come from, please?K8EZB wrote:Currently running .30 with some additional modifications..."
Rick
K8EZB
Jeff
NJ2US
I'm sorry, but that was out of left field, Rick is running .30? Where did this release come from, please?K8EZB wrote:Currently running .30 with some additional modifications..."
Rick
K8EZB
Jeff,Where did this release come from, please?
It's open source and others are welcome to contribute or create their own version and share the results. In my opinion, it is what makes the Anan radios an attractive alternative to other radios that depend on a company to create software and firmware along with the hardware.K4IBC wrote:What's the deal with the Parallel Universe and another Branch?
Not at all sure what is meant by this cryptic question. However, if you are referring to the Thetis modifications I have made to the 2.9.0.8 and 2.9.0.30 releases to support Acom amps and tuners, please be aware that these are in a local repository and not currently visible/accessible to anyone but me. After suitable testing, I will be putting these into a private github repository, and may eventually ask a principal Thetis developer to incorporate into the main public repository.What's the deal with the Parallel Universe and another Branch?
Ahhh, now I understand what you mean. I too hope he doesn't stop developing Thetis. My first go round with an earlier version he made available, I had problems getting VAC overflows and underflows to stabilize and had to revert back to Richie's latest release.K4IBC wrote:What I meant. Late last night local time Steve closed a lot of items and stated Parallel Universe. I imagine around the same time the releases disappeared. Steve has made great progress and done a lot of hard work developing. I would hate to see him stop and be discouraged by someone else's actions.
Strongly agree. I have no idea at this point what is behind Steve's thinking/actions.Steve has made great progress and done a lot of hard work developing. I would hate to see him stop and be discouraged by someone else's actions.
This is ridiculous. Both Steve and Richie have both publicly stated that other folks working on the code is totally OK by them. That they absolutely do not want to chill any development that might go on, large or small. This is as it should be, it's open source, open to all for development. Same on the user side: use the code, don't use the code, it's your choice.K4IBC wrote:What I meant. Late last night local time Steve closed a lot of items and stated Parallel Universe. I imagine around the same time the releases disappeared. Steve has made great progress and done a lot of hard work developing. I would hate to see him stop and be discouraged by someone else's actions.
Ok he has edited that since I last luck. It makes sense after reading he is just doing some house cleaning and reorganizing.Trucker wrote:Look at the bottom of this page. All is well.
https://github.com/sjk7/Thetis-2.9.0
Me too! Hopefully, this is temporary.Tony EI7BMB wrote:Glad I got 2.9.0.29 , before it got taken down, it works great
w-u-2-o wrote: It's reasonable to expect there will be some significant changes. Indeed, it will likely be different enough that it will no longer be called Thetis in order to strongly distinguish this new branch of code.
At any rate, we are all going to have to hold our horses, keep our shirts on, and cool our jets for a while![]()
73,
Scott
It's not my build. It's a copy of Steve's code, as is, where is, as seen. Use it or don't.K1LSB wrote:Scott,
If I may report a couple of observations on your 2.9.0.31a build...
w-u-2-o wrote: Other than for mechanical problems with the Git repo itself, please don't send me bug reports because I don't write code
They are both Steve's.I uninstalled 2.9.0.31a and reloaded Steve's 2.9.0.27 and all is well again.
Many thanks Tony but 2.9.0.29 didn't work for me, it refused to even open up in a session. Steve thinks maybe it had something to do with Win11.Tony EI7BMB wrote:hey Mark I have 29.9.0.29 64 msi here is you need it ?
Running Windows 11 Pro here. Had 2.9.0.29 working fine. Downloaded v2.9.0.31 from Scott's repository and installed directly over v2.9.0.29 ( made backup first) and so far, no noticeable issues. Loads fast. Both versions show the same cpu usage in Task Manager.K1LSB wrote:Many thanks Tony but 2.9.0.29 didn't work for me, it refused to even open up in a session. Steve thinks maybe it had something to do with Win11.Tony EI7BMB wrote:hey Mark I have 29.9.0.29 64 msi here is you need it ?
Mark
K1LSB wrote:Many thanks Tony but 2.9.0.29 didn't work for me, it refused to even open up in a session. Steve thinks maybe it had something to do with Win11.Tony EI7BMB wrote:hey Mark I have 29.9.0.29 64 msi here is you need it ?
Mark