Hi,
maybe it is a silly question, but which values are represented on the x-axis and the peak-blobs. It seems to be not related to the rx-meter.
See yellow marked areas in the screenshot (right click => open picture in new tab for full-image)
Thanks & 73 Ernst
x-Axis vs peak-blobs vs rx-meter
x-Axis vs peak-blobs vs rx-meter
- Attachments
-
- thetisdisplay.jpg (1.28 MiB) Viewed 3207 times
https://www.oe3ide.com
https://www.oe3ide.com/wp/thetis-skin/
Discord : https://discord.gg/6fHCRKnDc9
https://www.oe3ide.com/wp/thetis-skin/
Discord : https://discord.gg/6fHCRKnDc9
Re: x-Axis vs peak-blobs vs rx-meter
Hi Ernst,
it is refered to the bin bandwidth, which given the 26dB difference, should be set at 7.4Hz
10 log (2960/7.4) = 26
73, Clay
it is refered to the bin bandwidth, which given the 26dB difference, should be set at 7.4Hz
10 log (2960/7.4) = 26
73, Clay
Re: x-Axis vs peak-blobs vs rx-meter
Great post by Scott a while ago with explanation.
https://apache-labs.com/community/viewt ... =itu#p2999
https://apache-labs.com/community/viewt ... =itu#p2999
Gary NC3Z
Re: x-Axis vs peak-blobs vs rx-meter
Thanks for the explanation !
73 Ernst
73 Ernst
https://www.oe3ide.com
https://www.oe3ide.com/wp/thetis-skin/
Discord : https://discord.gg/6fHCRKnDc9
https://www.oe3ide.com/wp/thetis-skin/
Discord : https://discord.gg/6fHCRKnDc9
Re: x-Axis vs peak-blobs vs rx-meter
Just as an aside, since I reset my database and built it by hand again with the fast and furious pace of Ritchie's updates, I like to calibrate my S-Meter using the built in Cal tools. I use a Rohde & Schwarz sig gen and found that the stock S-meter and Spectrum call was off by .6 dB @ -73dB. Pretty damn good for no cal, but I still calibrated to be nuts on
Freq cal was off tad also, but WWV is always handy.

Freq cal was off tad also, but WWV is always handy.
Gary NC3Z